I hope you do not mind me barging into your inbox again, but I stumbled upon another problem. When wanting to say “greatest builder”, how do I reflect it is not greatest house, since the forms would be identical, if I’m not wrong? Zahar (house), uzhar (greatest house) – uzhar (builder), greatest builder would thus be the same?

thedwarrowscholar:

Well met,

No problem whatsoever, most welcome to barge in my friend.

So, to clarify what we are talking about here. In Neo-Khuzdul you have a form called the “elative”, which is used to indicate a degree of positive comparison. Similar to the comparative and superlative we know in English, but kinda rolled into one. Though unlike the comparative and superlative of English the form can be used for both adjectives and nouns in Neo-Khuzdul.

Now the issue is that the elative (just like the augmentative and ultimative – more on those later) are in fact words that are ancillary homonyms, meaning that they are words that are spelled and pronounced identically YET can mean various things.

Let’s take the root TLKh as an example for instance…

  • Augmentative: telkhar =supreme smith* (*artisan, smith-hammer)
  • Ultimative: telkhel = smith of all smiths* (*artisans, smith-hammers)
  • Elative: ‘utlakh = greater / greatest smith* (*artisan, smith-hammer)

So, in our example above, “Telkhar” can mean “supreme smith”, “supreme artisan” or “supreme smith-hammer”. Augmentative, ultimative and elative forms are all such ancillary forms (grammatical structures in Neo-Khuzdul that do NOT have a single meaning but contain a main meaning and one or more additional meanings).

The main meaning (usually listed first in the dictionary) is the one most commonly used, yet in some cases, the additional meanings are just as relevant or as frequently used.

image

So, this leads to the issue, “how do I differentiate between these different meanings?” Seeing the various forms are pronounced and written identically.

Well, here context is truly key. Like with all types of homonyms confusion is just around the corner and without context, it is very likely people might misunderstand you.

For instance, if you say “Dwalin ‘uzhar”. It is pretty clear you are not referring to Dwalin as a building, but as a builder. Just by using his name folks should know you are talking about a person and can rule out some of the other possible meanings of this elative. And when you would say “Zaharê ‘uzhar” the reader should have little doubt that “my house” (”zaharê”) is the “greatest building”. So, it all comes down to the context your surround your elative form with, which should clarify the intended meaning to the reader.

Note though that the word uzhar (person agent form, meaning “builder”) and ‘uzhar (elative form – meaning “greatest house or builder”) are NOT identical, as the latter has a glottal stop in the onset (which is both written and pronounced) while the former doesn’t.

In conclusion, if you are using elative, ultimative or augmentative forms in your translations (which earns you extra dwarvish brownie points by the way), mind you use context to clarify which possible meaning may apply.

For more information about these forms; and when to use and when NOT to use them, have a look at the library section, document 20 and 49.

Ever at your service,

The Dwarrow Scholar

Gabil Baraz Uzbad Mahal, barakh shley dhoyar.

misbehavingmaiar‌:

galvornsmith‌:

“Blessed art thou, Great Red Lord; merciful is thy Hammer. Blessed be thy forge and thy fire, that giveth life. May there be peace in my tribe, and strength in my arms. May the work of my shaping honor thee; may it never rust nor tarnish. Great Red Lord, M-H-L, bless now my anvil.“ 

The Smith’s Prayer

skyeventide:

adzolotl:

adzolotl:

glumshoe:

Why are blacksmiths so stigmatized in folklore? What about the profession gave them such a bad name and caused them to be closely associated with the Devil?

¯_(ツ)_/¯

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Smith_and_the_Devil “may be one of the oldest European folk tales […] possibly being first told in Indo-European 6,000 years ago”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blacksmiths_of_western_Africa “feared in some societies for their skill in metalworking, considered a form of magic“

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/039219216801606202 Maybe because traditional smelting techniques involve, human sacrifice? Allegedly?? Or maybe “Molten metal that flows is associated with flowing blood because
of its color, heat and the danger that arises from it”

okay now i’m Invested

https://irishfolklore.wordpress.com/2017/03/13/blacksmiths-and-the-supernatural/ “Their ability to turn raw materials such as iron ore or bog iron into usable tools and weapons made them seem like they were in possession of magic.“ … “8thcentury hymn to protect people from the ‘spells of women, smiths and druids’”

http://akkadium.com/fire-forge-glimpsing-craft-ethiopian-blacksmith/ “traditional beliefs that the earth is sacred, and fire (heat) is potentially polluting”

My third link concludes:

Those who are only slightly familiar with anthropology are aware
of the many explanations that have been proposed to account for the “blacksmith complex". He is impure because he is in contact
with iron (a loathsome and repulsive element), or with fire (from
which demons are born), or because he forges murderous weapons; or because he is endogamous, or is not independent, or because
blacksmiths are the dregs of conquered peoples, do not produce
their own food, do not go to war, and break some unknown divine
interdict. They are respected because they have dared to break
a divine interdict, because they make useful instruments, because
they are rich, because they are initiators, educators, religious chiefs,
peace-makers, sacrificers, civilising heroes, and even, according to
the embryological theory of M. Eliade, because they help the Earth
to give birth to minerals and in so doing are a substitute for Time etc. Their powers issue from their tools, from spirits hidden in
the bellows of their smithies, from fire, from the “numinous” force
of iron, from the ornaments they forge for shamans; or from the
celestial origins of their techniques, from their novelty, from the
fact that these secret techniques are hereditary, or simply because
they are in their possession; or again from the “ambivalent magic
of weapons made of stone,” which, by emitting sparks when
struck, are likened to lightning, a magic that is transmitted into
the metal; or from the fact that they forge flashes of lightning
for the gods, etc… 

One can see that, even when they contain elements of truth,
all these explanations are one-sided and often in need to be
explained themselves. The only valid explanation is one that can
show the inner reason for the different manifestations of the
“blacksmith complex” and their coexistence, and attain to the
structure that determines their interconnection and renders them
interdependent. 

An interpretation that coordinates the various elements of the
problem, on the basis of the blacksmith’s violation of taboo, should
satisfy these conditions. It would form part of a wider interpretation
of magical violations of taboo in general, based on an
analysis of the nature and function of taboos.

I remember reading that, in the Middle Ages, Muslims had a restricted number of professions available to them in Christian lands, among these blacksmithing, which may have come from the association of the blacksmith with the devil or may have fed into it, or both.

I can’t find an actual source for this right now, a brief google search isn’t helping me, but it seemed worth noting.

(also @theotherwesley)

Here’s a great bit from the BBC documentary Secrets of the Castle where they talk about how blacksmiths were seen as being able to participate in black magic but were also paradoxically immune to its corrupting effects, able to “tweak the devil’s nose” and get away with it. 

Also since this is my Tolkien blog, it’s interesting to note that technology, particularly metalworking, is viewed as a powerful corruptive force in Tolkien’s work. Metal and wheels pitted against trees and water; it’s all very much based on this trope in mythology. Aulë’s forces are the only ones amongst the Valar that are capable of being corrupted to evil; Sauron and Saruman are both maiar of Aulë, Aulë dared to create the semblance of life before Eru’s children had awoken on earth when he made the dwarves, and the dwarves in turn are suspect because they can be corrupted by their love of metals and gems; the Noldor are beloved of Aulë and it is the Noldor who first use his teachings to forge weapons and bring violence to Aman. We’re told that Aulë is the closest in temperament to Melkor, but his works are not inherently evil because he still submits to the divine authority. 

Error
This video doesn’t exist

ttrtru:

Inktober 2018
14.) Clock

I have this HC that Curumo was the one most fascinated with small machinery.  If he was in the modern times he’d be the type making small intricate watches.   In the mean time Melkor’d be making atomic clocks trying to achieve the ultimate in everything and Mairon’d just use anything connected with the internet, practicality being more his thing.

Past Inktober Arts | <old to new> | <new to old>

earthstory:

Native silver tree.

Formed in hydrothermal veins by precipitation from hot fluids, native silver forms some beautiful fern and tree like structures.

This specimen of silver wires on acanthite comes from one of the acknowledged best sources on Earth, now exhausted, in the Freiburg district of Saxony in Germany. Other famous locations include Norway, Mexico, Spain and Australia. Specimen size 8×6.

Loz

Image credit: Exceptional Minerals
http://www.minerals.net/mineral/silver.aspx

elbenherzart:

I started this piece back in January
but didn’t work on it for a while, since I was either too exhausted
,or to afraid of screwing it up. Interior Paintings combine all the
things I’m afraid of and not good in. But you can only improve if you
get out of your comfort zone, right? 😀

So what’s this? It
originally started out as a random sketch of a random anvil, because
I wanted to practice prop design. This turned into a full interior,
then into an elven inspired smithy and then into Celebrimbors Smithy.
Celebrimbor is a character of Tolkien, the elf that forged the Rings. I never played Shadows of Mordor and I have no idea if there
are any official concepts of his smithy. Couldn’t find any. This is
just my own take on it, tho I included the hammer he has with him in
the game.

I really fought my way through this and got
mentally exhausted by this piece. I wonder if it gets easier some
day?

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started